StablecoinsIntermediate

Why Banks Lobby Against Stablecoin Regulation

Protecting funding and fee structures by shaping rails and reward classifications.

7 min read
TradingPlatforms.com
Policy and Lobbying

Overview and Incentives

Lobbying aims to preserve low-cost deposits and fee-heavy rails while discouraging alternatives that pressure margins. Efforts focus on classification and steering adoption toward familiar account architectures.

Preferred Rails: Account-Based Fast Payments

Account-based faster payments (e.g., FedNow) keep settlement control and economics closer to incumbent models.

Rewards Classification: Indirect Interest

Classifying consumer rewards as “interest” pulls programs into banking-style rules, increasing compliance friction.

Narratives: Safety, Fraud, and Complexity

Messaging emphasizes risk and complexity to discourage consumer token rails, while underplaying card fees and settlement delays.

Impacts on Market Design

Issuers adjust with rebates, fee discounts, and disclosure improvements to balance compliance and user value.

Issuer and Platform Responses

Transparent reserves, audited statements, robust redemption mechanics, and compliant reward designs (rebates/discounts) build confidence and regulatory goodwill.

Conclusion

Lobbying seeks to shape rails and reward models. Where token rails offer superior economics, adoption continues despite policy headwinds.

Related

Explore Stablecoins and Exchanges

Learn, compare, and choose